Statement on Just Culture & Open Reporting

Owner: [DPO Name] (SIRO)

1. The 'Just Culture' Philosophy

At CheckTick, we recognize that human error is often a symptom of systemic issues. We foster an environment where:

  • Reporting is encouraged: Reporting a mistake (like clicking a suspicious link or misconfiguring a permission) is treated as a contribution to the company's safety.
  • No-Blame Analysis: We focus on how our technical safeguards (MFA, VPCs) failed to prevent the error, rather than who made it.
  • Near Miss Recognition: We celebrate the 'catch.' If a partner notices a security flaw before it is exploited, this is documented as a victory for our audit and review process.

2. Public & Patient Feedback

While we do not directly interface with patients in the same way as a clinical Trust (PALS), we acknowledge our responsibility to the public:

  • Public Security Reporting: Our documentation at checktick.uk/docs/ provides a path for researchers or users to report concerns.
  • Response Commitment: All security-related feedback receives an initial response within 24 hours.
  • Transparency: Where a concern is valid, we communicate the fix openly (via GitHub issues or our changelog) to demonstrate our commitment to safety.

3. Incident Review Example (Simulated Near Miss)

  • Event: Staff member noticed an old API key was still active in a test environment.
  • Action: Key was revoked immediately.
  • Just Culture Follow-up: Instead of reprimand, the team updated the 'Offboarding Checklist' to include a specific step for 'Test Environment Key Purge.'
  • Outcome: The system is now stronger due to the open reporting of the error.